Description
Jeremy Ko
This presentation articulates a novel approach to Social Security optimization for married couples which moves beyond analysis based on average or expected lifespan and toward prudent management of longevity risk. It specifically uses long projected lifespans from the 70th and 90th percentiles for each spouse. We devise rules for optimal claiming which migrate away from strategic claiming decisions (in which one spouse accounts for the other’s decision and maximizes the value of joint benefits) in the average lifespan case. They instead migrate toward decoupled decision making (in which each spouse maximizes the value of his or her personal benefit only) in the case of longer assumed lifespans. This approach can be used in all aspects of retirement planning including to determine savings thresholds, withdrawal rates, annuitization, long-term care insurance, etc.
Keith Jacks Gamble
Does working with a financial planner improve household outcomes, and does the CFP® credential add value on top of that? This session presents new evidence from the CFP Board's Financial Planning Longitudinal Survey, a panel of 3,357 U.S. households tracked across 2024 and 2025. Working with a planner is associated with roughly $220,000 more in investable wealth and higher financial satisfaction, even after controlling for demographics. Households that adopted a planner between the two survey years gained about $63,000 within a single year compared to non-users. The session also addresses the measurement challenge. Because many clients cannot say whether their planner holds the CFP designation, the estimated CFP-specific premium ranges from statistically insignificant under a conservative approach to about $128,000 under an inclusive one. Attendees will leave with an evidence-based way to talk with clients about the value of planning, a clear view of where the CFP premium is well-supported versus uncertain, and practical takeaways for the profession.
Eric Ludwig
SECURE 2.0 opened the door to guaranteed lifetime income inside defined contribution plans, yet consumer uptake of income annuities remains low even as interest in protection-oriented products such as RILAs continues to grow. Advisors, insurers, and plan sponsors are left describing these products largely by instinct, with little evidence about which explanations actually generate interest. When the description fails, the product never gets a fair hearing, regardless of whether it fits the client. This session presents results from a randomized controlled trial testing three communication strategies, analytical, emotional, and social identity, across two product types, measuring purchase intention, product attractiveness, and willingness to learn more.